Momj Kindergarten teacher and artist team up to create chalk obstacle courses for kids The Supreme Court on Friday declined to immediately weigh in on the legality of President Trump s plans to exclude immigrants living the country without legal permission from the 2 [url=https://www.stanley-cups.us]stanley cup[/url] 020 Census figures used to award states seats in Congress.Finding that a ruling on the merits of the case would be premature, the high court s conservatives, in a 6-3decision, set aside a lower court order that had blocked a proclamation Mr. Trump issued in the summer to change the apportionment process for U.S. House of Representatives districts.The conservati [url=https://www.stanleycup.cz]stanley cup[/url] ves on the court said the case is riddled with contingencies and speculation that impede judicial review, citing the uncertainty over which unauthori [url=https://www.stanleycups.at]stanley cup[/url] zed immigrants the Trump administration will be able to remove from the apportionment figures. At the end of the day, the standing and ripeness inquiries both lead to the conclusion that judicial resolution of this dispute is premature, the majority wrote in an unsigned opinion.Justice Stephen Breyer, an appointee of President Bill Clinton, declared Mr. Trump s proposed policy unlawful in a dissenting opinion supported by the two other members of the court s liberal wing, Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. While Friday s ruling technically allows Mr. Trump to continue his plans, its practical impact may be limited as the Justice Department has acknowledged it is very unlikely that Census Bureau officials will be able to identify and remove Jrug Third federal court puts brakes on Census citizenship question So what s going on in West Virginia s Republican primary In broad strokes, the GOP has two candidates it [url=https://www.adidasoriginal.de]adidas originals[/url] thinks can beat in [url=https://www.adidas-samba-adidas.es]adidas samba[/url] cumbent Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin in November: Rep. Evan Jenkins and Attorney General Patrick Morrisey. Manchin was elected as a socially conservative Democrat to replace the legendary Sen. Robert Byrd in 2010 and won a full term in 2012. He s known as a skilled politician, but West Virginia is much more Republican than it was just a few years ago, and President Trump is quite popular in the state. That makes Manchin one of the most [url=https://www.stanleycup.cz]stanley cup[/url] vulnerable, if not the most vulnerable, Democratic senator up for reelection this year. With Republicans possessing a one-seat majority in the chamber and facing the possibility of losing seats in the southwest, Republicans are counting on defeating Manchin to retain their control of the Senate. The big 7 races that will probably decide who controls the SenateHowever, Republicans have a major problem on their hands in West Virginia. His name is Don Blankenship, a coal baron who served a year in prison after being found culpable for a mine explosion that killed 29 people in 2010. He frequently makes racially charged statements, and he likes to refer to GOP Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell as Cocaine Mitch for reasons that are, at best, convoluted. And he also has a good shot at becoming the Republican senate nominee from West Virginia. Would that be good news for Democrats Yes