Erlu Why Lena Dunham Thinks Even Conservatives Need to Read Her Newsletter
California is suing Amazon [url=https://www.cup-stanley.es]stanley cup[/url] , the states attorney general announced Wednesday in a press release. The focus of the lawsuit, filed in the states Superior Court in San Francisco County, is on how Amazon allegedly crushes competition and inflates prices through restrictive agreements with its third-party sellers. Contracts between Amazon and its sellers effectively prevent the platforms [url=https://www.cups-stanley.us]cups stanley[/url] merchants from offering lower prices elsewhere鈥攅ven though Amazon is a relatively expensive site for sellers to use, the suit says. These agreements thwart the ability of other online retailers to compete, contributing to Amazons dominance in the online retail marketplace and harming merchants and consumers through inflated fees and higher prices, AG Rob Bontas announcement claimed. In other words: if a third-party merchant offers a product on, say, their own website where there are no associated fees to sell at a cheaper rate than on Amazons site, the massive e-tailer can retaliate, per these agreements. Some of those retaliatory practices have allegedly included removing the Buy Now or Add to Cart buttons from a merchants page, which can end up forcing sellers to either drop their prices on Amazon or raise them everywhere else. This results in a vicious anticompetitive cycle in which Amazon wins and its third-party sellers, its wholesale suppliers, consumers, and competition lose, reads the legal complaint. And for online sellers, abando [url=https://www.stanleymug.us]starbucks stanley cup[/url] ning Amazon to avoid the costs and hiked pri Epil Card Heist Occurs at Gen Con 2023, Over $300K s Worth Stolen
circa 1795: The 1st President of the United States, George Washington 1732 - 1799 in consultation with members of his first cabinetThree Lions / Getty ImagesBy Lindsay M. Chervinsky / History News Ne [url=https://www.stanley-tumbler.us]stanley mug[/url] tworkNovember 21, 2016 12:30 PM ESTThis post is in partnership with the History News Network, the website that puts the news into historical perspective. The article below was originally published at HNN.For the last week, stories on President-Elect Trumprsquo potential cabinet nominees have filled the news, and with good reason. Cabinet secretaries exercise enormous powermdash;they define and enforce policy with a great degree of autonomy. Yet none of these stories mention the fact that the Constitution did no [url=https://www.stanleycups.ro]stanley romania[/url] t create the cabinet, nor did Congress authorize it through legislation. In fact, no legal authority establishes the cabinet as an advisory body or regulates the relationship between the secretaries and President.The cabinetrsquo absence from the nationrsquo governing documents was no mistake. During the Federal Constitutional Convention in 1 [url=https://www.stanley-cups.es]termo stanley[/url] 787, the delegates rejected proposals that would have created a privy council to advise the President. Instead, they adopted Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, which provides two options for the president to obtain advice. First, the President can request written advice from the department secretaries. Second, the President can consult with the Senate on foreign affairs. The Constitution, a document of enumerated pow
- home
- gbs
- my new flail thread
- Viewing single post