Pmry Lyft Co-Founder: Uber s Strategy to Contain Us Didn t Work Photo illustration for TIME by Lon Tweeten; Source images: Melina Mara-Pool/Getty ImagesBy Mini RackerNovember 20, 2023 1:25 PM ESTNot too long ago, some Americans feared an inexperienced and mercurial President Donald Trump would start World War III. Now, hes basing his comeback bid on avoiding it. In a recent fundraising email, Trump lamented, [url=https://www.stanley-cup.pl]stanley cup[/url] it truly breaks my heart to see Crooked Joe鈥攖he [url=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de]stanley cup[/url] weakest and most incompetent president in history鈥攔uin our country as he pushes America to the brink of World War III. On the campaign trail, hes boasted that hes the only one that will prevent World War III. Amid ongoing wars between Russia and Ukraine and Israel and Hamas, fears about the prospect of another world war are rising, and Trump is just one of the political figures employing such dark language. On the left, the right, and even within the White House, the specter of the kind of global conflict not seen for nearly 80 years is proving to be a useful rhetorical tool, e [url=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de]stanley cups[/url] ven though its a comparison that historians say isnt apt for the current moment. This is language, I think, expanding way beyond the capacity for reality to sustain it, says Jay Winter, a 20th Century war historian and a professor emeritus at Yale.A survey conducted by the American Psychological Association soon after Russia invaded Ukraine last year found that nearly 7 in 10 Americans feared that we are at the beginning stages of World War III, a sentiment that allies of Russian President Vladimir Putin hav Sqbj Russia, the Ukraine, and the Markets: Broken BRICs Demonstrators with March for Our Lives, an anti-gun violence organization, protest near the White House ahead of the State of the Union speech in Washington, on March 1, 2022.Eric Lee鈥擝loomberg/Getty ImagesBy Philip ElliottApril 8, 2022 3:21 PM EDTThis article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIMErsquo politics newsletter. Sign up here to get stories like this sent to your inbox.For the first few years of Barack Obamarsquo presidency, the White House persuaded immigration activists to hold their fire. The incoming Obama team had to first rebuild the economy and make [url=https://www.adidasoriginal.de]adidas originals[/url] sure Detroitrsquo automakers didnrsquo;t shutter after the [url=https://www.hokas.com.de]hoka[/url] 2008 financial meltdown. Then came a massive healthcare reboot. Then Supreme Court nominations, a Republican takeover of Congress, and the Presidentrsquo own re-election.And then. And then. And then. There always seemed to be something keeping immigration from the frontburner. By 2014, long-simmering frustrations among immigration-rights advocates were ready to boil over and at the annual opening gala of the National Council on La Raza, as the umbrella group of adv [url=https://www.airforces.us]air force 1[/url] ocacy and social services group now known as UnidosUS was called at the time, Obama himself was targeted for blame. Deporter in chief burned, especially coming from the head of one of the largest Latino organizations in the country whose alumni had embedded throughout the Obama Administration.It clearly hurt the President, who had won re-election in 2012 with the backing of 7