Yekd NFL Will Investigate Peyton Manning for PED Usage In the 5th Circuit Court of Appe [url=https://www.stanley-cups.com.de]stanley thermobecher[/url] als latest decision about social media companies flagging and banning disinformation, censorship is the word of the day, and the concept of content moderation, as limited as it often seems, is a foreign concept. Late on Friday, the court released its decision on Texas bill H.B. 20, rejecting the idea that corporations have a freewheeling First Amendment right to censor what people say while giving Texans the green light to sue social media companies for removing their insane posts about vaccines sorry, I meant carrots causing brain tumors. Of course, this is a鈥攍ets be charitable and call it interesting 鈥攊nterpretation of what what online content moderation actually is. Texas Governor Greg Abbott originally signed H.B. 20 into law last year, allowing Texans to sue large social media companies like Facebook and Twitter for moderating users content or banning their accounts. Tech companies argued this bill would restrict them from removing an [url=https://www.stanley-quencher.us]stanley cup[/url] d moderating dangerous content, such as conspiracies, violent threats, or government propaganda. After objections from the biggest tech companies and trade groups, the law was quickly shot down by a federal court. For some of these outlandish red state laws attacking big tech, that usually spells the end of it. Only H.B. 20 just wouldnt die. In May, the 5th circuit court of appeals overruled the h [url=https://www.stanleycups.com.mx]stanley thermo[/url] old placed on the law by federal courts. That decision kicked the can over to the U.S. Supreme Court Fqwy NASA 39 Comet Tale Draws to a Successful Close in Utah Desert By Olivia B. WaxmanOctober 23, 2020 6:49 PM EDTAt the presidenti [url=https://www.stanley-cup.it]stanley mug[/url] al debate on Thursday, as the candidates were talking about their visions for the future, one comment about the past caught a lot of viewers ; attention.After President Trump said that it was a good thing that he had a good relationship with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, as Presidents are supposed to maintain good relationships with other world leaders, Democratic candidate Joe Biden fired back: We had a good relationship with Hitler before he, in fact, invaded Europe, the rest of Europe. Come on.Some pundits shared that one-line comparison without any additional context, while others pointed to the trope known as Godwin Law: the idea that, allowed to go on long enough, any online debate will eventually end in a compa [url=https://www.stanleycup.lt]stanley cup[/url] rison being made to Adolf Hitler or Nazism. Other Twitter users, however, concentrated on whether the analogy was historically accurate.So is Biden right that America had a good relationship with Hitler prior to the beginning of World War II Yes and no.The relationship between the U.S. and Germany in the 1930s is very complicated and multilayered and can ;t be reduced to a sound bite, says Michael D. Hattem, Associate Directo [url=https://www.cup-stanley.es]stanley cup[/url] r of the Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute and an expert on how early American politics are remembered throughout U.S. history. While the Congress was committed to non-interventionism, the financial and corp