Ouhm Doctors and experts are seeing more cases of nearsightedness in children. Here s what you can do A New York appellate judge on Wednesday refused to halt collection of Donald Trump s $454 million civil fraud penalty while he appeals, rejecting the former president s request that he be allowed to post a bond covering just a fraction of what he owes.Judge Anil Singh of the state s mid-level appeals court ruled that Trump must post a bond covering the full amount in order to stop enforcement of the judgment. Singh did grant some of Trump s requests, including pausing a three-year ban on him seeking loans from New York banks 鈥?which could help him secure the necessary bond.Trump s lawyers told the appellate court earlier Wednesday that Trump was prepared to post a $100 million bond, arguing that the lending ban in the Feb. 16 verdict made it i [url=https://www.stanley-cups.co.uk]stanley uk[/url] mpossible for him to secure a bond for the full amount.Trump s lawyers floated the smaller bond offer in court papers as th [url=https://www.stanleycups.at]stanley becher[/url] ey sought an order from [url=https://www.stanleycups.ro]stanley cups[/url] the appellate court preventing New York Attorney General Letitia James office from enforcing the judgment while his appeal plays out. Singh ruled that Trump needs to post the full amount, which would pause collection automatically.In all, the Republican presidential front-runner and his co-defendants owe more than $465 million to the state. They have until March 25 to secure a stay, a legal mechanism pausing collection while he appeals, or they ll be forced to pay the monetary penalty or risk having some of their assets seized.SEE MORE: Mitch McConnell will step down as Senate Republican leade Smao Ex-Proud Boys organizer from Florida gets 17 years in prison in Jan. 6 case More than a year into this pandemic, roughly 10 million Americans still unable to return to their jobs. Among those continuing to struggle the most w [url=https://www.cup-stanley.us]stanley flask[/url] ith workforce re-entry are women.Experts have pointed to this troubling trend for months, and now, trends show it has hit its possible worst point last month when the Bureau of Labor Statistics released Decembers Employment Situation Summary. What we did not expect at all was that every single job that was lost was going to belong to a woman, said Jasmine Tucker with the National Womens Law Clinic. Men gained 16,000 jobs and women lost 156,000 jobs, which gave us a net of 140,000 jobs. That was a big surprise. Essentially, every net job loss in the U.S. in December belonged to a woman. Decembers job loss for women came after nine months of consistent disproportionate job loss for women when compared to their male counterparts.Researchers, such as Tucker, believe the job loss is related to two main factors. The first being women having to leave the workfo [url=https://www.stanley-cup.ca]stanley canada[/url] rce to care for children at home. If you have two earners, and one has to stay home with a toddler, who is it going to be said Tucker. It is going to be [url=https://www.stanley-cups.it]stanley borraccia[/url] the lower earner. Women currently make, on average, 82 cents on the dollar compared to men.The second reason for the disproportionate job loss is employers are simply letting go of more women. Racism and sexism is alive and well in this country and employers are making choices, added Tucker. This has real impacts not just n